Ideology of groups

Evolution

It is proposed to imagine a concrete and abstract human in a rapidly changing world. It is also suggested to imagine that such a human is experiencing internal disappointment that the world is completely different from the one that was a few years ago and is constantly and unpredictably changing. And such a human has a feeling that the world is changing in the direction in which the changes were not foreshadowed.

It is quite fair that, as a result of such reasoning, the lived past of such a human gradually depreciates. For all the changes that are taking place provide such a human with the opportunity to adapt to new realities and change.

For such a human, external changes will now not only provide a new opportunity, but will even force such a human to perform certain actions in which the human must recapitulate his past and relate it to the present. Namely, much of the past, such a human needs to deliberately forget. Rather, such a human needs to transform his views on the world and consolidate everything experienced as an experience of the past. But along with the human whom we together introduced, there are also many others whom we did not represent. It is they who, meeting with changes on the road of reality, begin to resists the changes. With every step they begin to show inner callousness, or even creating a panic, they begin to rapidly run away from changes. Of course, there are many other rapid actions by those whom we did not represent. But those other actions are already occurring solely as consequences.

Typologies of group behavior

Thus, there is a sorting (crushing) of typologies into two groups, and it is completely imperceptible.

The first group is changing. And the second group either resists or runs. Subsequently, sooner or later, those groups are forced to meet, and begin to conflict with each other, unequivocally and irrevocably proving their own correctness. But just like the truth of the conflicting parties, so is the basis of discord among the conflicting parties, these are other people's interpretations, backed up by their own excerpts and embedding into their own lives. Which by the way is paradoxical and very important, the basis of contention is equal to the principle by which the sorting (crushing) of groups takes place. For this is information

Group Scale

Of course, as everyone is well aware, there can be much more than two groups. Or three. Even in one group of a billion people, there may be more than a thousand classes. And each of the classes will create metamorphoses (changes). And each unit of which, interacting with each other, will eventually be fascinated and subsequently disappointed in a particular group. And all this will contribute to the emergence of confrontation, which is based somewhere deep inside each cell of the group.

Confrontation

As a result, everything will cause a conflict between classes. And all this will take place directly within a one group. Which for some time, sometime in the past, but still was an integral structure. Subsequently, the group begins to partially break up and the members move from one group to another.

Breakup of the group and consequences

The disintegration of the group begins from the beginning of the manifestation of aggression or fear within the group.

The rate of disintegration of the group depends in direct proportion to the number of unsecured, uneducated, but able-bodied, free and moderately cultural units within the groups. And if such participants remain within the group, and subsequently, using culture, they are also rewarded with power, then the entire group will be quite constrained, closed, and will certainly be doomed to tyranny or genocide. Otherwise, such players will be forced to move to another group or will try to do so, gathering supporters around them in order to start a transition movement from one group to another.

But unlike external changes, conflict both between groups and within groups occurs for completely different reasons. As for the causes of fear or aggression, they are hidden, also they are completely different.

Broke shattering dreams

When a human experiences information saturation and overflow of the inner world, the human begins to dream. This is the norm when, after filling, a human makes a generalization of fullness and produces a synthesis, for the sake of the birth of the event horizon of tomorrow. This is not even the norm, but rather an innate function of the brain. And the size of a person's dreams depends on the angle of scope human horizon, the radius of education (not to be confused with culture) and the volume of content with processed information slag (interpretation). For the absorption of information necessarily implies its processing. But in the case of increasing information, only the absorption of information occurs and the human's dreams are broken in the direction of their constant change. There is a paradox of the mind. The dream has not yet been created, but it has already been destroyed. If figuratively imagined, then there is an effect of a balloon flying in an unknown direction, from which air escapes at a fast speed, reducing the size of the balloon and taking the balloon away along an unknown trajectory. Air is a human’s capabilities (energy and material resources), and a balloon is a human. The analogy exactly applies to movement between classes within groups.

Disappointment

In addition, as a consequence of the investigation, both within groups and when moving from one group to another, a human is forced to accept stops in development, due to disappointment from many unfulfilled dreams. For a human's dreams becomes so fragile that every change in external factors at lightning speed produces its deformation or destruction.

Spring

Thus, a human forms within himself a multitude of compressed springs consisting of restraint, each of which necessarily requires straightening. For if something is cocked or wound up, then it subsequently implies some kind of action. This mechanism, located in the brain of living organisms, is one of many that allows you to overcome obstacles.

Due to the accumulation of internal springs of restraint, the work of self-destruction of a human takes place. First, the destruction of the personality occurs, and later, and as a consequence of the destruction of the personality, but already in actions, the destruction of the personalities of the environment occurs. But when a human's personality is destroyed, the human again turns into an animal or a plant (figuratively, of course). It all depends on the fullness of the human and the ability to work. In society, such a human automatically turns into an animal of the predator category. And if a human is sufficiently cultured and ill-mannered, then such a human turns into a hidden predator. For the more cultured a human is, the easier it is for him, paying attention to curtsy, to hide the lack of education.

All this contributes to the moving of people between groups and the change in both their ideologies and the ideologies of other participants. All this changes the size of groups and leads to various kinds of conflicts both within groups and between them. All this changes changing the norm of ideology and the form of the ideal, forming new and new groups.

When moving between groups, in the vast majority, a human is always emptied, and the ideal is always hypertrophied. At its core, the form of the ideal always depends only on the filling of a human. And if the predator moves between predators, the shape of the ideal will be predetermined by the predator. The scale of the ideal depends on the generosity of the human. And the dominant and paradoxical pattern in all this lies precisely in the fact that when the group is divided, then each participant becomes hidden greedy. For such a person becomes a predator not of his own free will. Especially if such a person is impatient and cultured enough.

There is only one way out